Posts: 454
Threads: 41
Likes Received:
45 in 42 posts
Likes Given: 40
Joined: May 2020
Reputation:
48
Points: 7,356.97
Achievements:
(View All Achievements)
Rank:
It's almost if 'they' haven't really thought this all through.
Posts: 209
Threads: 7
Likes Received:
24 in 20 posts
Likes Given: 10
Joined: Jun 2020
Reputation:
24
Points: 3,519.76
Achievements:
(View All Achievements)
Rank:
The only place I see them making sense is the daily commuter that will charge at night during low demand times. I'm paying about 8 1/2 cents/kwhr so the numbers woud probably line up for me for the wife's car. Would have to look hard if it'd be better than her Prius which gets her about 55-60 mpg.
Charging at night for us would probably be about 50% nuclear and 50% coal. That's our base load plants here in the Southeast.
No way e cars will work without a lot more nuclear. Its the only dependable, high capacity factor, low emission choice out there for most of us.
Posts: 454
Threads: 41
Likes Received:
45 in 42 posts
Likes Given: 40
Joined: May 2020
Reputation:
48
Points: 7,356.97
Achievements:
(View All Achievements)
Rank:
See, I believe they have.
So the question is why?